I am going to give this a fuller reading bc it sticks in my head that there's a lot to be sayd about the topic, as much as that what you're talking about is not philosophy of *Space*, but philosophy of *Place*, which dissolves the discrepancy imo. That puts the philosophy in scope of our relationships to space, not space per-se.
Actuality - the universe as it is beyond the perception of a mind, is infinite undifferentiated change. The experienced, usually measured, aspect of that change is time. Space is an aspect of time - how much change is required to move between stable patterns.
Together, time, space, and scale are the three primary dimensions. Scale is an aspect of space - how much space is encompassed within a stable pattern.
Philosophy of property rights, which, like all things, inherently has an aspect of space involved, is not a philosophy of space. Likewise ethics of space is not really philosophy of space.
I am going to give this a fuller reading bc it sticks in my head that there's a lot to be sayd about the topic, as much as that what you're talking about is not philosophy of *Space*, but philosophy of *Place*, which dissolves the discrepancy imo. That puts the philosophy in scope of our relationships to space, not space per-se.
i'm talking about space here as in outer space!! :)
Have you read Magna Carta of Outer Space?
Philosophy of space can be summed up as such:
Actuality - the universe as it is beyond the perception of a mind, is infinite undifferentiated change. The experienced, usually measured, aspect of that change is time. Space is an aspect of time - how much change is required to move between stable patterns.
Together, time, space, and scale are the three primary dimensions. Scale is an aspect of space - how much space is encompassed within a stable pattern.
Philosophy of property rights, which, like all things, inherently has an aspect of space involved, is not a philosophy of space. Likewise ethics of space is not really philosophy of space.